blob: c824732999898281f2e36f95d4638c562181df41 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
|
require 'spec_helper'
describe 'ensure_packages' do
it { is_expected.not_to eq(nil) }
it { is_expected.to run.with_params().and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError) }
it {
pending("should not accept numbers as arguments")
is_expected.to run.with_params(1).and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError)
}
it {
pending("should not accept numbers as arguments")
is_expected.to run.with_params(["packagename", 1]).and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError)
}
it { is_expected.to run.with_params("packagename") }
it { is_expected.to run.with_params(["packagename1", "packagename2"]) }
context 'given a catalog with "package { puppet: ensure => absent }"' do
let(:pre_condition) { 'package { puppet: ensure => absent }' }
describe 'after running ensure_package("facter")' do
before { subject.call(['facter']) }
# this lambda is required due to strangeness within rspec-puppet's expectation handling
it { expect(lambda { catalogue }).to contain_package('puppet').with_ensure('absent') }
it { expect(lambda { catalogue }).to contain_package('facter').with_ensure('present') }
end
describe 'after running ensure_package("facter", { "provider" => "gem" })' do
before { subject.call(['facter', { "provider" => "gem" }]) }
# this lambda is required due to strangeness within rspec-puppet's expectation handling
it { expect(lambda { catalogue }).to contain_package('puppet').with_ensure('absent').without_provider() }
it { expect(lambda { catalogue }).to contain_package('facter').with_ensure('present').with_provider("gem") }
end
end
end
|
