Adds @allchin2020

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/epistemology.bib b/epistemology.bib
index 1a627c6..d549472 100644
--- a/epistemology.bib
+++ b/epistemology.bib
@@ -572,3 +572,21 @@
   volume    = "",
   url       = "",
 }
+
+% url = {https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2020.82.3.188},
+% url = {https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Counter-Roll-in-Science-Allchin/121379c55eef2f1a86ca533f3a3e44d99036419f},
+% eprint = {https://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/82/3/188/397444/abt\_2020\_82\_3\_188.pdf},
+@article{allchin2020,
+  title    = {The Counter-Roll in Science},
+  author   = {Allchin, Douglas},
+  year     = {2020},
+  journal  = {The American Biology Teacher},
+  volume   = {82},
+  number   = {3},
+  pages    = {188-191},
+  month    = {03},
+  abstract = {A controlled experiment, everyone learns early in school, is the hallmark of good science. But what, exactly, is the hallmark of a controlled experiment?For many people, a controlled experiment is, straightforwardly, one “controlled” by the scientist. If you can “control” the variables and produce a predicted result (based on your hypothesis), then you seem to have proved cause and effect. Scientific credibility seems to emerge from the power of demonstration and technology. However, this widespread view of the core meaning of control in science – this month's Sacred Bovine – is mistaken (Boring, 1954, 1969). It thus fosters a misleading impression of what makes scientific claims reliable. Here, I journey through the history of the term control and show how the concept contributes to the distinctive nature of scientific reasoning.},
+  issn     = {0002-7685},
+  doi      = {10.1525/abt.2020.82.3.188},
+  url      = {http://douglasallchin.net/papers/Allchin-SB-Counter-roll.pdf},
+}