From 1ceb403c23074755be7205959c75ad2ca7bdb833 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Silvio Rhatto Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 13:00:19 -0300 Subject: Adds @allchin2020 --- epistemology.bib | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/epistemology.bib b/epistemology.bib index 1a627c6..d549472 100644 --- a/epistemology.bib +++ b/epistemology.bib @@ -572,3 +572,21 @@ volume = "", url = "", } + +% url = {https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2020.82.3.188}, +% url = {https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Counter-Roll-in-Science-Allchin/121379c55eef2f1a86ca533f3a3e44d99036419f}, +% eprint = {https://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/82/3/188/397444/abt\_2020\_82\_3\_188.pdf}, +@article{allchin2020, + title = {The Counter-Roll in Science}, + author = {Allchin, Douglas}, + year = {2020}, + journal = {The American Biology Teacher}, + volume = {82}, + number = {3}, + pages = {188-191}, + month = {03}, + abstract = {A controlled experiment, everyone learns early in school, is the hallmark of good science. But what, exactly, is the hallmark of a controlled experiment?For many people, a controlled experiment is, straightforwardly, one “controlled” by the scientist. If you can “control” the variables and produce a predicted result (based on your hypothesis), then you seem to have proved cause and effect. Scientific credibility seems to emerge from the power of demonstration and technology. However, this widespread view of the core meaning of control in science – this month's Sacred Bovine – is mistaken (Boring, 1954, 1969). It thus fosters a misleading impression of what makes scientific claims reliable. Here, I journey through the history of the term control and show how the concept contributes to the distinctive nature of scientific reasoning.}, + issn = {0002-7685}, + doi = {10.1525/abt.2020.82.3.188}, + url = {http://douglasallchin.net/papers/Allchin-SB-Counter-roll.pdf}, +} -- cgit v1.2.3