New feature: basic Ajax suggestion for tags and implementation of Dojo toolkit

git-svn-id: https://semanticscuttle.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/semanticscuttle/trunk@151 b3834d28-1941-0410-a4f8-b48e95affb8f

1 files changed, 966 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/includes/js/dojo/tests/number.js b/includes/js/dojo/tests/number.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..902484a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/includes/js/dojo/tests/number.js
@@ -0,0 +1,966 @@
+if(!dojo._hasResource["tests.number"]){ //_hasResource checks added by build. Do not use _hasResource directly in your code.
+dojo._hasResource["tests.number"] = true;
+dojo.provide("tests.number");
+
+dojo.require("dojo.number");
+
+/**
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.expect(...) 
+ */
+tests.number.check=function(t,options,sourceInput,expectResult){
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, t,options,sourceInput,expectResult,false);
+	tests.number.checkParse(t, t,options,expectResult,sourceInput);	
+}
+
+/**
+ * Perform a single formatting check or a backward check
+ * backward check:number1 -(formatted)-> string1 -(parsed)-> number2 -(formated)-> string2
+ * then number should == number2; string1 should == string2
+ */
+tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle=function(t,options,sourceInput,expectResult,
+		 backwardCheck/*boolean,indicates whether need a backward chain check,like formate->parse->format*/){	
+	if(null != options){
+		var pattern = options.pattern;
+		var locale = options.locale;
+		//TODO: add more fields
+	}
+	
+	//print("\n");
+	var str = null==pattern?"default":pattern;
+	//print("pattern:" + str + "| locale:" + locale);
+	//print("input:" + sourceInput);
+	var result = dojo.number.format(sourceInput,options);
+	//print("result:" + result);
+	if(null != expectResult){
+	    t.is(expectResult,result);
+	}
+	if(backwardCheck){
+		var resultParsed = dojo.number.parse(result,options);
+		//print("resultParsed:" + resultParsed);		
+		if(!tests.number._decimalNumberDiff(sourceInput,resultParsed)){	
+		    t.is(sourceInput,resultParsed);
+		}		
+		var resultParsedReformatted = dojo.number.format(resultParsed,options);
+		//print("resultParsedReformatted:" + resultParsedReformatted);
+	    if(!tests.number._decimalNumberDiff(result,resultParsedReformatted)){
+			t.is(result,resultParsedReformatted);
+		}
+	}	
+}
+
+/**
+ * Perform a single parsing check
+ */
+tests.number.checkParse=function(t,options,sourceInput,expectResult){
+	var str = "default";
+	if(null != options && null != options.pattern){	
+		str = options.pattern;
+	}
+	//print("input:" + sourceInput);
+	var result = dojo.number.parse(sourceInput,options);
+	//print("result :" + result);
+	if(null != expectResult){
+	    t.is(expectResult,result);
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * //TODO:Round a given number
+ */
+tests.number.rounding = function(t,number,maxFractionDigits,expected){
+	var pattern="#0.";
+	for(var i=0; i<maxFractionDigits; i++){pattern += "#";}
+	var result = dojo.number.format(number,{pattern:pattern});
+	t.is(expected,result);	
+}
+
+/**
+ * Run a batch parsing
+ */
+function runBatchParse(options,dataArray/*array*/,pass/*boolean*/){
+	var exception = null;
+	var result;
+	var i=0;
+	var str = (null==options.pattern)?"default":options.pattern;
+	
+	//print("\n");
+	for(; i<dataArray.length; i++){
+		try{
+			//print("["+i+"]"+"input:"+dataArray[i]);
+			result = dojo.number.parse(dataArray[i],options);			
+			if(isNaN(result)){
+				throw "\"" + dataArray[i] + "\" is parsed to NaN with pattern " + str;
+			}
+			//print("["+i+"]"+"output:"+result);	
+		}catch(e){
+			exception = e;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+		
+	if(!pass && (exception == null)) {
+		throw "runBatchParse() - stric parse failed, no exception when parsing illegal data"; 
+	}else if(exception != null){
+		if(!pass && i == 0){
+			//strict parsing should fail for all the dataArray elements as expected
+			//pass condition for strict parsing
+			return;
+		}
+		throw "runBatchParse() failed: " + exception;		
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * Check whether the given two numbers differ under the decimal bound
+ * 
+ */
+tests.number._decimalNumberDiff = function(num1,num2){
+	//TODO: should be more accurate when dojo.number finish rounding in the future
+	var diffBound = 1e-3;
+	var diff = num1 - num2;
+	//print("Math.abs(diff) " + Math.abs(diff));
+	if(Math.abs(diff) < diffBound ){
+		return true;
+	}else if(isNaN(Math.abs(diff))){	
+		var s = num1.toString().split(num2);
+		s[1] = s[1].replace(",","0");
+		s[1] = s[1].replace('\u066b','0');
+		return (new Number(s[1])< diffBound);
+	}
+	return false;	
+}
+
+tests.register("tests.number", 
+	[
+		{
+			// Test formatting and parsing of currencies in various locales pre-built in dojo.cldr
+			// NOTE: we can't set djConfig.extraLocale before bootstrapping unit tests, so directly
+			// load resources here for specific locales:
+
+			name: "number",
+			setUp: function(){
+				var partLocaleList = ["en-us", "fr-fr", "de-de"];
+
+				for(var i = 0 ; i < partLocaleList.length; i ++){
+					dojo.requireLocalization("dojo.cldr","number",partLocaleList[i], "zh-cn,zh,ko-kr,pt,en-us,en-gb,de,ja,ja-jp,en,ROOT,en-au,fr,es,ko,zh-tw,it,es-es,de-de");
+				}
+			},
+			runTest: function(t){
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "format", // old tests
+			runTest: function(t){
+
+	t.is("0123", dojo.number.format(123, {pattern: "0000"}));
+	t.is("-12,34,567.890", dojo.number.format(-1234567.89, {pattern: "#,##,##0.000##"}));
+	t.is("-12,34,567.89012", dojo.number.format(-1234567.890123, {pattern: "#,##,##0.000##"}));
+	t.is("(1,234,567.89012)", dojo.number.format(-1234567.890123, {pattern: "#,##0.000##;(#,##0.000##)"}));
+	t.is("(1,234,567.89012)", dojo.number.format(-1234567.890123, {pattern: "#,##0.000##;(#)"}));
+	t.is("50.1%", dojo.number.format(0.501, {pattern: "#0.#%"}));
+	t.is("98", dojo.number.format(1998, {pattern: "00"}));
+	t.is("01998", dojo.number.format(1998, {pattern: "00000"}));
+	t.is("0.13", dojo.number.format(0.125, {pattern: "0.##"})); //NOTE: expects round_half_up, not round_half_even
+	t.is("0.1250", dojo.number.format(0.125, {pattern: "0.0000"}));
+	t.is("0.1", dojo.number.format(0.100004, {pattern: "0.####"}));
+
+	t.is("-12", dojo.number.format(-12.3, {places:0, locale: "en-us"}));
+	t.is("-1,234,567.89", dojo.number.format(-1234567.89, {locale: "en-us"}));
+//	t.is("-12,34,567.89", dojo.number.format(-1234567.89, {locale: "en-in"}));
+	t.is("-1,234,568", dojo.number.format(-1234567.89, {places:0, locale: "en-us"}));
+//	t.is("-12,34,568", dojo.number.format(-1234567.89, {places:0, locale: "en-in"}));
+	t.is("-1\xa0000,10", dojo.number.format(-1000.1, {places:2, locale: "fr-fr"}));
+	t.is("-1,000.10", dojo.number.format(-1000.1, {places:2, locale: "en-us"}));
+	t.is("-1\xa0000,10", dojo.number.format(-1000.1, {places:2, locale: "fr-fr"}));
+	t.is("-1.234,56", dojo.number.format(-1234.56, {places:2, locale: "de-de"}));
+	t.is("-1,000.10", dojo.number.format(-1000.1, {places:2, locale: "en-us"}));
+	t.is("123.46%", dojo.number.format(1.23456, {places:2, locale: "en-us", type: "percent"}));
+
+	//rounding
+	t.is("-1,234,568", dojo.number.format(-1234567.89, {places:0, locale: "en-us"}));
+//	t.is("-12,34,568", dojo.number.format(-1234567.89, {places:0, locale: "en-in"}));
+	t.is("-1,000.11", dojo.number.format(-1000.114, {places:2, locale: "en-us"}));
+	t.is("-1,000.11", dojo.number.format(-1000.115, {places:2, locale: "en-us"}));
+	t.is("-1,000.12", dojo.number.format(-1000.116, {places:2, locale: "en-us"}));
+	t.is("-0.00", dojo.number.format(-0.0001, {places:2, locale: "en-us"}));
+	t.is("0.00", dojo.number.format(0, {places:2, locale: "en-us"}));
+
+	//change decimal places
+	t.is("-1\xa0000,100", dojo.number.format(-1000.1, {places:3, locale: "fr-fr"}));
+	t.is("-1,000.100", dojo.number.format(-1000.1, {places:3, locale: "en-us"}));
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "parse", // old tests
+			runTest: function(t){
+	t.is(1000, dojo.number.parse("1000", {locale: "en-us"}));
+	t.is(1000.123, dojo.number.parse("1000.123", {locale: "en-us"}));
+	t.is(1000, dojo.number.parse("1,000", {locale: "en-us"}));
+	t.is(-1000, dojo.number.parse("-1000", {locale: "en-us"}));
+	t.is(-1000.123, dojo.number.parse("-1000.123", {locale: "en-us"}));
+	t.is(-1234567.89, dojo.number.parse("-1,234,567.89", {locale: "en-us"}));
+	t.is(-1234567.89, dojo.number.parse("-1 234 567,89", {locale: "fr-fr"}));
+	t.t(isNaN(dojo.number.parse("-1 234 567,89", {locale: "en-us"})));
+
+	t.t(isNaN(dojo.number.parse("10,00", {locale: "en-us"})));
+	t.t(isNaN(dojo.number.parse("1000.1", {locale: "fr-fr"})));
+
+	t.t(isNaN(dojo.number.parse("")));
+	t.t(isNaN(dojo.number.parse("abcd")));
+
+	//test whitespace
+//	t.is(-1234567, dojo.number.parse("  -1,234,567  ", {locale: "en-us"}));
+
+//	t.t(dojo.number.parse("9.1093826E-31"));
+	t.is(0.501, dojo.number.parse("50.1%", {pattern: "#0.#%"}));
+
+	t.is(123.4, dojo.number.parse("123.4", {pattern: "#0.#"}));
+	t.is(-123.4, dojo.number.parse("-123.4", {pattern: "#0.#"}));
+	t.is(123.4, dojo.number.parse("123.4", {pattern: "#0.#;(#0.#)"}));
+	t.is(-123.4, dojo.number.parse("(123.4)", {pattern: "#0.#;(#0.#)"}));
+
+	t.is(null, dojo.number.format("abcd", {pattern: "0000"}));
+	
+	t.is(123, dojo.number.parse("123", {places:0}));
+	t.is(123, dojo.number.parse("123", {places:'0'}));
+	t.is(123.4, dojo.number.parse("123.4", {places:1}));
+	t.is(123.45, dojo.number.parse("123.45", {places:'1,3'}));
+	t.is(123.45, dojo.number.parse("123.45", {places:'0,2'}));
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "format_icu4j3_6",
+			runTest: function(t){
+
+/*************************************************************************************************
+ * Evan:The following test cases are referred from ICU4J 3.6 (NumberFormatTest etc.) 
+ * see http://icu.sourceforge.net/download/3.6.html#ICU4J
+ *************************************************************************************************/
+
+
+/**
+ * In ICU4J, testing logic for NumberFormat.format() is seperated into 
+ * differernt single tese cases. So part of these logic are 
+ * collected together in this single method.
+ * 
+ * !!Failed cases are as follows:
+ * 1.1234567890987654321234567890987654321 should be formatted as 
+ *   1,234,567,890,987,654,321,234,567,890,987,654,321 with all the default parameters,
+ *   but got 1.234 instead, may due to the unimplemeted exponent.
+ * 2.\u00a4 and ' are not replaced
+ * 	 with pattern "'*&'' '\u00a4' ''&*' #,##0.00"
+ *   1.0 should be formatted to "*&' Re. '&* 1.00",but got "'*&'' '\u00a4' ''&*' 1.00" instead
+ *   etc.   
+ * 		
+ */
+	//print("test_number_format_icu4j3_6() start..............");
+	/* !!Failed case, 1.234 returned instead
+	//refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestCoverage() 
+	var bigNum = 1234567890987654321234567890987654321;
+	var expectResult = "1,234,567,890,987,654,321,234,567,890,987,654,321";
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, null,bigNum,expectResult,false);
+	*/	
+	
+	//in icu4j should throw out an exception when formatting a string,
+	//but it seems dojo.number.format can deal with strings
+	//return 123,456,789
+	dojo.number.format("123456789");
+	
+	//!!Failed case, \u00a4 and ' are not replaced
+	/*
+	var options = {pattern:"'*&'' '\u00a4' ''&*' #,##0.00",locale:"en-us"};
+	tests.number.check(t, options,1.0, "*&' Re. '&* 1.00");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,-2.0, "-*&' Rs. '&* 2.00");	
+
+	options = {pattern:"#,##0.00 '*&'' '\u00a4' ''&*'",locale:"en-us"};
+	tests.number.check(t, options,1.0,"1.00 *&' Re. '&*");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,-2.0,"-2.00 *&' Rs. '&*");
+	*/
+	//print("test_number_format_icu4j3_6() end..............\n");
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "format_patterns",
+			runTest: function(t){
+
+/**
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestPatterns() which now only coveres us locale	
+ */
+	//print("test_number_format_Patterns() start..............");
+	var patterns = (["#0.#", "#0.", "#.0", "#"]);
+	var patternsLength = patterns.length;    
+	var num = (["0","0", "0.0", "0"]);
+	var options;
+	//icu4j result seems doesn't work as:
+	//var num = (["0","0.", ".0", "0"]);      
+	for (var i=0; i<patternsLength; ++i)
+	{	
+		options = {pattern:patterns[i]};
+		tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, options,0,num[i],false);       
+	}
+	
+	//!!Failed case
+	//In ICU4J:
+	//        unquoted special characters in the suffix are illegal
+	//        so "000.000|###" is illegal; "000.000'|###'" is legal
+	//dojo.number.format:
+	//        when formatting 1.2 with illegal pattern "000.000|###"
+	//		  no exception was thrown but got "001.200|###" instead.
+	
+	/*
+	patterns = (["000.000|###","000.000'|###'"]);
+	var exception = false;
+	var result;
+	for(var i = 0; i < patterns.length; i ++){
+		try{
+			//"001.200'|###'" is return for "000.000'|###'"
+			//"001.200|###" is return for "000.000|###"
+			result = dojo.number.format(1.2,{pattern:patterns[i]});
+			print("["+i+"] 1.2 is formatted to " + result + " with pattern " + patterns[i]);
+		}catch(e){
+			exception = true;
+		}
+		if(exception && i==1){
+			throw "["+i+"]Failed when formatting 1.2 using legal pattern " + patterns[i];
+		}else if(!exception && i==0){
+			throw "["+i+"]Failed when formatting 1.2 using illegal pattern  " + patterns[i];
+		}
+	}*/	
+	//print("test_number_format_Patterns() end..............\n");
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "exponential",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * TODO: For dojo.number future version 
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestExponential()
+ */
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "format_quotes",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * TODO: Failed case
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestQuotes()
+ */
+	//print("test_number_format_Quotes() start..............");
+	//TODO: add more locales 
+	
+	//TODO:!!Failed case	
+	//Pattern "s'aa''s'c#" should format 6666 to "saa'sc6666", but got s'aa''s'c6666 instead
+	// is this case necessary?
+	/*
+	var pattern = "s'aa''s'c#";   
+	var result = dojo.number.format(6666,{pattern:pattern,locale:"en-us"});
+	var expectResult = "saa'sc6666";
+	t.is(expectResult,result);
+	*/
+	//print("test_number_format_Quotes() end..............");     
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "format_rounding",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestRounding487() and NumberFormatTest.TestRounding()
+ */
+	//print("test_number_format_rounding() start..............");
+	tests.number.rounding(t,0.000179999, 5, "0.00018");
+	tests.number.rounding(t,0.00099, 4, "0.001");
+	tests.number.rounding(t,17.6995, 3, "17.7");
+	tests.number.rounding(t,15.3999, 0, "15");
+	tests.number.rounding(t,-29.6, 0, "-30");
+	
+	//TODO refer to NumberFormatTest.TestRounding()
+	
+	//print("test_number_format_rounding() end..............");
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "format_scientific",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * TODO: For dojo.number future version
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestScientific()- Exponential testing 
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestScientific2() 
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestScientificGrouping()
+ */
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "format_perMill",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * TODO: Failed case 
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestPerMill()
+ */
+	//print("test_number_format_PerMill() start..............");
+	var pattern;
+	var result;
+	var expectResult;
+	
+    //TODO: !!Failed case - ###.###\u2030(\u2030 is ‰)
+	//Pattern ###.###\u2030 should format 0.4857 as 485.7\u2030,but got 485.700\u2030 instead    
+	pattern = "###.###\u2030";
+	expectResult = "485.7\u2030";
+	result = dojo.number.format(0.4857,{pattern:pattern});
+	t.is(expectResult,result);
+
+    //TODO: !!Failed mile percent case - ###.###m
+	//Pattern "###.###m" should format 0.4857 to 485.7m, but got 0.485m instead
+	/*
+	pattern = "###.###m";
+	expectResult = "485.7m";
+	result = dojo.number.format(0.4857,{pattern:pattern,locale:"en"});
+	t.is(expectResult,result);	
+	*/
+	//print("test_number_format_PerMill() end..............\n");
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "format_grouping",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * Only test en-us and en-in 
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestSecondaryGrouping()
+ */
+	//print("test_number_format_Grouping() start..............");
+	//primary grouping
+	var sourceInput = 123456789;
+	var expectResult = "12,34,56,789";
+	var options = {pattern:"#,##,###",locale:"en-us"};	
+
+	//step1: 123456789 formated=> 12,34,56,789
+	//step2:12,34,56,789 parsed=> 123456789 => formated => 12,34,56,789
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, options,sourceInput,expectResult,true);
+						  
+	//TODO: sencondary grouping not implemented yet ?
+	//Pattern "#,###" and secondaryGroupingSize=4 should format 123456789 to "12,3456,789"			
+	
+	//Special case for "en-in" locale
+	//1876543210 should be formated as 1,87,65,43,210 in "en-in" (India)
+/*
+	sourceInput = 1876543210;
+	expectResult = "1,87,65,43,210";
+	var result = dojo.number.format(sourceInput,{locale:"en-in"});
+	t.is(expectResult,result);   
+*/
+	//print("test_number_format_Grouping() end..............\n");    
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "format_pad",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * TODO:!!Failed cases:
+ * According to ICU4J test criteria:
+ * 1.with pattern "*^##.##":
+ * 	 0 should be formatted to "^^^^0",but got "*^0" instead,
+ *   -1.3 should be formatted to "^-1.3",but got "-*^1.3" instead.
+ *   
+ * 2.with pattern "##0.0####*_ 'g-m/s^2'" :
+ *   0 should be formatted to "0.0______ g-m/s^2",but got ":0.0*_ 'g-m/s^2'" instead
+ *   1.0/3 should be formatted to "0.33333__ g-m/s^2",but got "0.33333*_ 'g-m/s^2'" instead
+ *   
+ * 3.with pattern "*x#,###,###,##0.0#;*x(###,###,##0.0#)":
+ * 	 -10 should be formatted to "xxxxxxxxxx(10.0)",but got "*x(10.0)" instead.
+ *   10 should be formatted to "xxxxxxxxxxxx10.0",but got "*x10.0" instead.
+ *   ......
+ *   -1120456.37 should be formatted to "xx(1,120,456.37)",but got "*x(1,120,456.37)" instead.
+ *   1120456.37 should be formatted to "xxxx1,120,456.37",but got "*x1,120,456.37" instead.
+ *   -1252045600.37 should be formatted to "(1,252,045,600.37)",but got "*x(1,252,045,600.37)" instead.
+ *   1252045600.37 should be formatted to "10,252,045,600.37",but got "*x10,252,045,600.37" instead.
+ *   
+ * 4.with pattern "#,###,###,##0.0#*x;(###,###,##0.0#*x)"
+ * 	 -10 should be formatted to (10.0xxxxxxxxxx),but got "(10.0*x)" instead.
+ *   10 should be formatted to "10.0xxxxxxxxxxxx",but got "10.0*x" instead.
+ *   ......
+ *   -1120456.37 should be formatted to "(1,120,456.37xx)",but got "(1,120,456.37*x)" instead.
+ *   1120456.37 should be formatted to "xxxx1,120,456.37",but got "1,120,456.37*x" instead.
+ *   -1252045600.37 should be formatted to "(1,252,045,600.37)",but got "(1,252,045,600.37*x)" instead.
+ *   1252045600.37 should be formatted to ""10,252,045,600.37"",but got "10,252,045,600.37*x" instead.*   
+ * 
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestPad()
+ */
+/*
+function test_number_format_pad(){
+	var locale = "en-us";
+	print("test_number_format_Pad() start..............");
+	var options = {pattern:"*^##.##",locale:locale};
+
+	tests.number.check(t, options,0,"^^^^0");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,-1.3,"^-1.3");	
+	
+	
+	options = {pattern:"##0.0####*_ 'g-m/s^2'",locale:locale};
+	tests.number.check(t, options,0,"0.0______ g-m/s^2");	
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, options,1.0/3,"0.33333__ g-m/s^2",true);	
+	
+	//exponent not implemented
+	//options = {pattern:"##0.0####E0*_ 'g-m/s^2'",locale:locale};
+	//tests.number.check(t, options,0,"0.0E0______ g-m/s^2");
+	//tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, options,1.0/3,"333.333E-3_ g-m/s^2",true);
+	
+	// Test padding before a sign
+	options = {pattern:"*x#,###,###,##0.0#;*x(###,###,##0.0#)",locale:locale};
+
+	tests.number.check(t, options,-10,"xxxxxxxxxx(10.0)");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,-1000, "xxxxxxx(1,000.0)");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,-1000000, "xxx(1,000,000.0)");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,-100.37, "xxxxxxxx(100.37)");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,-10456.37, "xxxxx(10,456.37)");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,-1120456.37, "xx(1,120,456.37)");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,-112045600.37, "(112,045,600.37)");    
+	tests.number.check(t, options,-1252045600.37, "(1,252,045,600.37)");
+
+
+	tests.number.check(t, options,10, "xxxxxxxxxxxx10.0");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,1000, "xxxxxxxxx1,000.0");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,1000000, "xxxxx1,000,000.0");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,100.37, "xxxxxxxxxx100.37");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,10456.37, "xxxxxxx10,456.37");        
+	tests.number.check(t, options,1120456.37, "xxxx1,120,456.37");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,112045600.37, "xx112,045,600.37");
+	tests.number.check(t, options,10252045600.37, "10,252,045,600.37");
+
+	// Test padding between a sign and a number
+	options = {pattern:"#,###,###,##0.0#*x;(###,###,##0.0#*x)",locale:locale};
+	tests.number.check(t, options, -10, "(10.0xxxxxxxxxx)");
+	tests.number.check(t, options, -1000, "(1,000.0xxxxxxx)");
+	tests.number.check(t, options, -1000000, "(1,000,000.0xxx)");
+	tests.number.check(t, options, -100.37, "(100.37xxxxxxxx)");
+	tests.number.check(t, options, -10456.37, "(10,456.37xxxxx)");    
+	tests.number.check(t, options, -1120456.37, "(1,120,456.37xx)");
+	tests.number.check(t, options, -112045600.37, "(112,045,600.37)");   
+	tests.number.check(t, options, -1252045600.37, "(1,252,045,600.37)");  
+
+	tests.number.check(t, options, 10, "10.0xxxxxxxxxxxx");
+	tests.number.check(t, options, 1000, "1,000.0xxxxxxxxx");
+	tests.number.check(t, options, 1000000, "1,000,000.0xxxxx");
+	tests.number.check(t, options, 100.37, "100.37xxxxxxxxxx");
+	tests.number.check(t, options, 10456.37, "10,456.37xxxxxxx");
+	tests.number.check(t, options, 1120456.37, "1,120,456.37xxxx");
+	tests.number.check(t, options, 112045600.37, "112,045,600.37xx");
+	tests.number.check(t, options, 10252045600.37, "10,252,045,600.37");	
+	
+	//Not implemented yet,refer to NumberFormatTest.TestPatterns2()
+	//For future use - maily test pad patterns
+	print("test_number_format_Pad() end..............");
+}
+*/
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "parse_icu4j3_6",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * In ICU4J, testing logic for NumberFormat.parse() is seperated into 
+ * differernt single tese cases. So part of these logic are 
+ * collected together in this test case. * 
+ */
+	//print("test_number_parse_icu4j3_6() start..............");
+	//Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestParse() which is only a rudimentary version
+	var pattern = "00";
+	var str = "0.0";	
+	var result = dojo.number.parse(str,{pattern:pattern});
+	//TODO: add more locales
+//FIXME: is this a valid test?
+//	t.is(0,result);
+
+	/**************************************** tolerant parse *****************************************
+	 * refers to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestStrictParse()??
+	 * TODO: Seems dojo.number parses string in a tolerant way.  
+	 */
+	 var options = {locale:"en-us"};
+	/*
+	 * TODO: !!Failed case,Should all pass,
+	 * but the following elements failed (all parsed to NaN):
+	 * [1]-"0 ",[2]-"0.",[3]-"0,",[5]-"0. ",[6]-"0.100,5",
+	 * [7]-".00",[9]-"12345, ",[10]-"1,234, ",[12]-"0E" 
+	 */
+	var passData = ([
+		"0",           //[0] single zero before end of text is not leading
+        //"0 ",        //[1] single zero at end of number is not leading
+        //"0.",        //[2] single zero before period (or decimal, it's ambiguous) is not leading
+        //"0,",          //[3] single zero before comma (not group separator) is not leading
+        "0.0",         //[4] single zero before decimal followed by digit is not leading
+        //"0. ",       //[5] same as above before period (or decimal) is not leading
+        //"0.100,5",   //[6] comma stops parse of decimal (no grouping)
+        //".00",       //[7] leading decimal is ok, even with zeros
+        "1234567",     //[8] group separators are not required
+        //"12345, ",   //[9] comma not followed by digit is not a group separator, but end of number
+        //"1,234, ",   //[10] if group separator is present, group sizes must be appropriate
+        "1,234,567"   //[11] ...secondary too
+        //,"0E"         //[12]not implemented yet,an exponnent not followed by zero or digits is not an exponent 
+         ]);
+	runBatchParse(options,passData,true/*tolerant parse*/);	
+	
+	/* 
+	 * TODO:!!Failed case,should all pass,
+	 * but the following failed,
+	 * [10]-"1,45 that" implies that we partially parse input
+	 */
+	var failData = ([            
+		"00",          //[0] leading zero before zero
+        "012",         //[1] leading zero before digit
+        "0,456",       //[2] leading zero before group separator
+        "1,2",         //[3] wrong number of digits after group separator
+        ",0",          //[4] leading group separator before zero
+        ",1",          //[5] leading group separator before digit
+        ",.02",        //[6] leading group separator before decimal
+        "1,.02",       //[7] group separator before decimal
+        "1,,200",      //[8] multiple group separators
+        "1,45",        //[9] wrong number of digits in primary group
+        //"1,45 that",   //[10] wrong number of digits in primary group
+        "1,45.34",     //[11] wrong number of digits in primary group
+        "1234,567",    //[12] wrong number of digits in secondary group
+        "12,34,567",   //[13] wrong number of digits in secondary group
+        "1,23,456,7890" //[14] wrong number of digits in primary and secondary groups
+		]);
+	runBatchParse(options,failData,false);
+	
+	 options = {pattern:"#,##,##0.#",locale:"en-us"};
+	/*
+	 * TODO:!!Failed case,shoudl all pass.
+	 
+	 * but [1] [2] and [3] failed
+	 * should be parsed to 1234567,but NaN instead 
+	 */
+	var mixedPassData = ([            
+		"12,34,567"    	//[0]
+        //,"12,34,567,"		//[1]
+        //"12,34,567, that",//[2]
+        //"12,34,567 that"	//[3]
+		]);	
+	runBatchParse(options,mixedPassData,true/*tolerant parse*/);
+	
+	/*
+	 * TODO:!!Failed case,should all pass,
+	 * but actually mixedFailData[2] and mixedFailData[3] passed.
+	 * "12,34,56, that " and [3]-"12,34,56 that" should be parsed to 123456,but NaN instead
+	 */
+	var mixedFailData = ([
+        "12,34,56",			//[0]
+        "12,34,56,"		//[1]
+        //,"12,34,56, that ",//[2]
+        //"12,34,56 that",	//[3]
+		]);			
+	runBatchParse(options,mixedFailData,false);
+	
+
+	/**************************************** strict parse ******************************************
+	 * TODO:May need to test strict parsing in the future?
+	 * e.g. A strict parsing like (with pattern "#,##0.#") 
+	 * 1.Leading zeros
+	 * 		'00', '0123' fail the parse, but '0' and '0.001' pass
+	 * 2.Leading or doubled grouping separators
+	 * 		',123' and '1,,234" fail
+	 * 3.Groups of incorrect length when grouping is used
+	 * 		'1,23' and '1234,567' fail, but '1234' passes
+	 * 4.Grouping separators used in numbers followed by exponents
+	 * 		'1,234E5' fails, but '1234E5' and '1,234E' pass
+	 */	
+	//options={locale:"en",strict:true};
+	//runBatchParse(options,passData,false/*strict parse*/);
+	//runBatchParse(options,failData,false/*strict parse*/);	
+	
+	//options = {pattern:"#,##,##0.#",locale:"en-us",strict:true};
+	//runBatchParse(options,mixedPassData,false/*strict parse*/);
+	//runBatchParse(options,mixedFailData,false/*strict parse*/);		
+
+	//print("test_number_parse_icu4j3_6() end..............\n");
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "parse_whitespace",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * TODO:!!Failed case
+ * With pattern "a  b#0c  ",both "a b3456c " and and "a   b1234c   " should be parsed to 3456,but got NaN instead.
+ * 
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatTest.TestWhiteSpaceParsing
+ */
+    /*
+	print("test_number_parse_WhiteSpace() start..............");
+   	var pattern = "a  b#0c  ";
+	var expectResult = 3456;   
+	result =  dojo.number.parse("a b3456c ",{pattern:pattern,locale:"en-us"});
+   	t.is(expectResult,result);	
+	result =  dojo.number.parse("a   b3456c   ",{pattern:pattern,locale:"en-us"});
+	t.is(expectResult,result);
+	print("test_number_parse_WhiteSpace() end..............\n");
+	*/   
+			}
+		},
+/*************************************************************************************************
+ *                            Regression test cases
+ * These test cases are referred to ICU4J's NumberFormatRegressionTest and NumberFormatRegression.
+ * The regression cases in ICU4J are used as unit test cases for bug fixing, 
+ * They are inluced here so that dojo.number may avoid those similar bugs. 
+ *************************************************************************************************/
+		{
+			name: "number_regression_1",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatRegressionTest.Test4161100()
+ */
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:"#0.#"},-0.09,"-0.1",false);
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "number_regression_2",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * !!Failed case,rounding hasn't been implemented yet.
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberFormatRegressionTest.Test4408066()
+ */
+	/*
+	var data =   ([-3.75, -2.5, -1.5, 
+                   -1.25, 0,    1.0, 
+                   1.25,  1.5,  2.5, 
+                   3.75,  10.0, 255.5]);
+	var expected = (["-4", "-2", "-2",
+                    "-1", "0",  "1",
+                	"1",  "2",  "2",
+                	"4",  "10", "256"]);
+	var options = {locale:"zh-cn",round:true};
+	for(var i =0; i < data.length; i++){
+		tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, options,data[i],expected[i],false);
+	}	
+
+	data = ([ 	"-3.75", "-2.5", "-1.5", 
+              	"-1.25", "0",    "1.0", 
+              	"1.25",  "1.5",  "2.5", 
+              	"3.75",  "10.0", "255.5"]);
+	expected =([ -3, -2, -1,
+                 -1, 0,  1,
+                 1,  1,  2,
+                 3,  10, 255]);
+	
+	for(var i =0; i < data.length; i++){
+		tests.number.checkParse(t, options,data[i],expected[i]);
+	}
+	*/
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "number_regression_3",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberRegression.Test4087535() and Test4243108()
+ */
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {places:0},0,"0",false);
+	//TODO:in icu4j,0.1 should be formatted to ".1" when minimumIntegerDigits=0
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {places:0},0.1,"0",false);	
+	tests.number.checkParse(t, {pattern:"#0.#####"},123.55456,123.55456);
+//!! fails because default pattern only has 3 decimal places
+//	tests.number.checkParse(t, null,123.55456,123.55456);
+	
+	//See whether it fails first format 0.0 ,parse "99.99",and then reformat 0.0 
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:"#.#"},0.0,"0",false);
+	tests.number.checkParse(t, null,"99.99",99.99);
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:"#.#"},0.0,"0",false);
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "number_regression_4",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * TODO:
+ * In ICU -0.0 and -0.0001 should be formatted to "-0" with FieldPosition(0)
+ * dojo.i18n.number format -0.0 to "-0"; -0.0001 to "-0.000100" 
+ * 
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberRegression.Test4088503() and Test4106658()
+ */
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {places:0},123,"123",false);
+	
+	//TODO: differernt from ICU where -0.0 is formatted to "-0"
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {locale:"en-us"},-0.0,"0",false);
+	
+	//TODO: differernt from ICU where -0.0001 is formatted to "-0"
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {locale:"en-us",places:6},-0.0001,"-0.000100",false);
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "number_regression_5",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * !!Failed case,rounding has not implemented yet.
+ * 0.00159999 should be formatted as 0.0016 but got 0.0015 instead.
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberRegression.Test4071492()
+ */
+	//tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {places:4,round:true},0.00159999,"0.0016",false);	
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "number_regression_6",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberRegression.Test4086575()
+ */
+	var pattern = "###.00;(###.00)";
+	var locale = "fr";
+	var options = {pattern:pattern,locale:locale};
+	
+	//no group separator
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, options,1234,"1234,00",false);
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, options,-1234,"(1234,00)",false);	
+	
+	//space as group separator
+	pattern = "#,###.00;(#,###.00)";
+	options = {pattern:pattern,locale:locale};
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, options,1234,"1\u00a0234,00",false);// Expect 1 234,00
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, options,-1234,"(1\u00a0234,00)",false);  // Expect (1 234,00)
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "number_regression_7",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * !!Failed case - expontent has not implemented yet 
+ * shuold format 1.000000000000001E7 to 10000000.00000001, but got 10,000,000.000 instead
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberRegression.Test4090489() - loses precision
+ */
+	//tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, null,1.000000000000001E7,"10000000.00000001",false);	
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "number_regression_8",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/** 
+ * !!Failed case
+ * 1.with pattern "#,#00.00 p''ieces;-#,#00.00 p''ieces"
+ *   3456.78 should be formated to "3,456.78 p'ieces",
+ *   but got "3,456.78 p''ieces","''" should be replaced with "'"
+ * 2.with illegal pattern "000.0#0"
+ * 	 no error for the illegal pattern, and 3456.78 is formatted to 456.780
+ * 3.with illegal pattern "0#0.000"
+ * 	 no error for the illegal pattern, and 3456.78 is formatted to 3456.780
+ * 
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberRegression.Test4092480(),Test4074454() 
+ */
+	var patterns = (["#0000","#000","#00","#0","#"]);
+	var expect = (["0042","042","42","42","42"]);
+	
+	for(var i =0; i < patterns.length; i ++){
+		tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:patterns[i]},42,expect[i],false);
+		tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:patterns[i]},-42,"-"+expect[i],false);	
+	}
+	
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:"#,#00.00;-#.#"},3456.78,"3,456.78",false);
+	//!!Failed case
+	//tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:"#,#00.00 p''ieces;-#,#00.00 p''ieces"},3456.78,"3,456.78 p'ieces",false);	
+	//tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:"000.0#0"},3456.78,null,false);
+	//tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:"0#0.000"},3456.78,null,false);	
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "number_regression_9",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * TODO
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberRegression.Test4052223()
+ */
+	//TODO:only got NaN,need an illegal pattern exception? 
+	tests.number.checkParse(t, {pattern:"#,#00.00"},"abc3");	
+	
+	//TODO: got NaN instead of 1.222, is it ok?
+	//tests.number.checkParse(t, {pattern:"#,##0.###",locale:"en-us"},"1.222,111",1.222);
+	//tests.number.checkParse(t, {pattern:"#,##0.###",locale:"en-us"},"1.222x111",1.222);
+	
+	//got NaN for illeal input,ok
+	tests.number.checkParse(t, null,"hello: ,.#$@^&**10x");	
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "number_regression_10",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberRegression.Test4125885()
+ */
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:"000.00"},12.34,"012.34",false);
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:"+000.00%;-000.00%"},0.1234,"+012.34%",false);
+	tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:"##,###,###.00"},9.02,"9.02",false);
+	
+	var patterns =(["#.00", "0.00", "00.00", "#0.0#", "#0.00"]);
+	var expect =  (["1.20", "1.20", "01.20", "1.2",   "1.20" ]);
+	for(var i =0 ; i < patterns.length; i ++){
+		tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:patterns[i]},1.2,expect[i],false);
+	}
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "number_regression_11",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * TODO:!!Failed case
+ * Make sure that all special characters, when quoted in a suffix or prefix, lose their special meaning.
+ * The detail error info :  
+ * for input 123
+ * pattern:'0'#0'0'; expect:"01230"; but got "'3'#0'0'" instead
+ * pattern:','#0','; expect:",123,"; but got "','123','" instead
+ * pattern:'.'#0'.'; expect:".123."; but got "'.'123'.'" instead
+ * pattern:'‰'#0'‰'; expect:"‰123‰"; but got "'‰'123000'‰'" instead
+ * pattern:'%'#0'%'; expect:"%123%"; but got "'%'12300'%'" instead
+ * pattern:'#'#0'#'; expect:"#123#"; but got "'123'#0'#'" instead
+ * pattern:';'#0';'; expect:";123;"; but got "[dojo-test] FATAL exception raised: 
+ * 											  unable to find a number expression in pattern: '"
+ * pattern:'E'#0'E'; expect:"E123E"; not implemeted yet
+ * pattern:'*'#0'*'; expect:"*123*"; but got "'*'123'*'" instead
+ * pattern:'+'#0'+'; expect:"+123+"; but got "'+'123'+'" instead
+ * pattern:'-'#0'-'; expect:"-123-"; but got "'-'123'-'" instead
+ * 
+ * TODO: is it ok to remain "'" in the formatted result as above??
+ * 
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberRegression.Test4212072()
+ */
+/*
+	var specials = ([ '0', ',', '.', '\u2030', '%', '#',';', 'E', '*', '+', '-']);
+	var pattern; 
+	var expect;
+	
+	for(var i=0; i < specials.length; i ++){
+		pattern = "'" + specials[i] + "'#0'" + specials[i] + "'";
+		expect = "" +  specials[i] + "123" +  specials[i];
+		tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:pattern,locale:"en-us"},123,expect,false);
+	}
+*/
+			}
+		},
+		{
+			name: "number_regression_12",
+			runTest: function(t){
+/**
+ * TODO: add more rounding test cases, refer to ICU4J's NumberRegression.Test4071005(),Test4071014() etc.. 
+ */
+
+/**
+ * TODO:Decimal format doesnt round a double properly when the number is less than 1
+ * 
+ * Refer to ICU4J's NumberRegression.test4241880()
+ */
+/*
+	var input = ([ .019, .009, .015, .016, .014,
+                	.004, .005, .006, .007, .008,
+                	.5, 1.5, .05, .15, .005,
+                	.015, .0005, .0015]);
+	var patterns = (["##0%", "##0%", "##0%", "##0%", "##0%",
+                	 "##0%", "##0%", "##0%", "##0%", "##0%",
+                	 "#,##0", "#,##0", "#,##0.0", "#,##0.0", "#,##0.00",
+                	 "#,##0.00", "#,##0.000", "#,##0.000"]);
+	var expect =([   "2%", "1%", "2%", "2%", "1%",
+                	 "0%", "0%", "1%", "1%", "1%",
+                	 "0", "2", "0.0", "0.2", "0.00",
+                	 "0.02", "0.000", "0.002",]);
+	for(var i = 0; i <input.length; i ++){
+		tests.number.checkFormatParseCycle(t, {pattern:patterns[i],round:true},input[i],expect[i],false);
+	}
+*/
+			}
+		}
+	]
+);
+
+}