Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The function only uses the first argument, so raise an error with
too few arguments *and* with too many arguments.
|
|
This reverts commit f7a18189ec338b01b0fc89d75def832753af3868, reversing
changes made to 36a7b29630a4d4de17af79b5dd4e9491ec20b123.
I'm reverting this change because of concerns raised by Peter Meier that
it duplicates the "in" operator in the DSL. The "in" operator is new
information that I did not posses when I made the decision to merge.
Because of this new information I'm un-merging and continuing the
discussion in the comments of
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/19272
Reference: GH-130
|
|
It is exceptionally difficult to determine if an array contains an element matching a specific value without an iteration or loop construct.
This function is the Puppet equivalent of Array.includes?(foo) in Ruby. The implementation is a verbatim copy of has_key() with the minor modifications needed to support arrays instead of hashes.
|
|
|
|
Without this patch applied there is no easy way to append one array to
another. This is a problem because it is often desirable to join two
arrays without flattening the contents into a single, one dimensional
array.
This patch addresses the problem by adding a `concat()` function which
takes two arguments. The arguments will be concatenated together and a
new array returned to the caller.
Reviewed-by: Jeff McCune <jeff@puppetlabs.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 4.x:
Add test/validation for is_float if created from an arithmetical operation
Add test/validation for is_integer if created from an arithmetical operation
Add test/validation for is_numeric if created from an arithmetical operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 4.x:
Add reject() function
|
|
Like the grep function, but we can now reject members of an array
based on a pattern.
|
|
* 4.x:
(#17797) min() and max() functions
|
|
returns the min or max of all arguments given to them
|
|
* 4.x:
Add join_keys_to_values function
|
|
This commit adds a function that joins each of a hash's keys with that
key's corresponding value, separated by a separator string. The
arguments are a hash and separator string. The return value is an
array of joined key/value pairs.
|
|
* jfryman-master:
puppet-lint cleanup
|
|
Previous to this commit, the delete function only acted on
arrays. This commit adds the same functionality for hashes and strings
in the obvious way: delete(h, k) would delete the k key from the h
hash and delete(s, sub) would delete all instances of the sub
substring from the s string.
|
|
|
|
This function is similar to a coalesce function in SQL in that it will
return
the first value in a list of values that is not undefined or an empty
string
(two things in Puppet that will return a boolean false value).
Typically,
this function is used to check for a value in the Puppet
Dashboard/Enterprise
Console, and failover to a default value like the following:
$real_jenkins_version = pick($::jenkins_version, '1.449')
The value of $real_jenkins_version will first look for a top-scope
variable
called 'jenkins_version' (note that parameters set in the Puppet
Dashboard/
Enterprise Console are brought into Puppet as top-scope variables), and,
failing that, will use a default value of 1.449.
|
|
If one wishes to test if a host has a particular IP address (such as a floating
virtual address) or has an interface on a particular network (such as a
secondary management network), the facts that provide this information are
difficult to use within Puppet.
This patch addresses these needs by implementing functions
‘has_ip_address(value)’ and ‘has_ip_network(value)’. These functions look
through all interfaces for ipaddress_<interface> and network_<interface>
(respectively) having the requested <value>.
These functions are implemented on top of a lower-level predicate
function, ‘has_interface_with(kind, value)’, which iterates through the
interfaces in the ‘interfaces’ fact and checks the facts <kind>_<interface>
looking for <value>.
Additionally, the existence of a particular named interface can be checked for
by calling with only a single argument: has_interface_with(interface).
A Boolean is returned in all cases.
|
|
|
|
* 2.3.x:
(Maint) Fix mis-use of rvalue functions as statements
Add .rspec file to repo root
|
|
* 2.2.x:
(Maint) Fix mis-use of rvalue functions as statements
Add .rspec file to repo root
|
|
* 2.1.x:
(Maint) Fix mis-use of rvalue functions as statements
Add .rspec file to repo root
Conflicts:
spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/getvar_spec.rb
spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/has_key_spec.rb
spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/merge_spec.rb
|
|
Without this patch applied the spec tests are invalid because they call
rvalue functions as if they were statements. This is a problem because
Puppet 2.7.x currently throws an exception if a rvalue function is
invoked as if it were a statement function. This exception from Puppet
is causing tests to fail.
This patch fixes the problem by changing the tests to assign the return
value of the functions to a variable. This fixes the problem by
invoking the functions properly.
Paired-with: Andrew Parker <andy@puppetlabs.com>
|
|
Converts a string like "2 MB" to the value in bytes. Useful for
comparisons on facts that return a human readable number instead of
machine readable.
|
|
This patch is the same approach as the one that want into 2.3.x. It
covers the functions in master that do not exist in 2.3.x.
Without this patch all of the spec tests for parser functions in stdlib
would instantiate their own scope instances. This is a problem because
the standard library is tightly coupled with the internal behavior of
Puppet. Tight coupling like this creates failures when we change the
internal behavior of Puppet. This is exactly what happened recently
when we changed the method signature for the initializer of
Puppet::Parser::Scope instances.
This patch fixes the problem by creating scope instances using the
puppet labs spec helper. The specific method that provides scope
instances in Puppet-version-independent way is something like this:
let(:scope) { PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetInternals.scope }
This patch simply implements this across the board.
Paired-with: Andrew Parker <andy@puppetlabs.com>
|
|
* 2.3.x:
Disable tests that fail on 2.6.x due to #15912
|
|
* 2.2.x:
Disable tests that fail on 2.6.x due to #15912
|
|
In Puppet 2.6.x there is a bug where a function may be incorrectly detected as
an rvalue when it is not, or not detected when it is. This means that in tests
the correct syntax for calling a function will be rejected. This disables
those tests on 2.6.x, as there is no straightforward way to write them to be
compatible with both 2.6.x and newer versions of Puppet.
|
|
* 2.3.x:
Make sure functions are loaded for each test
Use rvalue functions correctly
(Maint) Don't mock with mocha
(Maint) Fix up the get_module_path parser function
(Maint) use PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetSeams.parser_scope (2.3.x)
(Maint) Rename PuppetlabsSpec::Puppet{Seams,Internals}
(Maint) use PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetSeams.parser_scope
(Maint) Fix interpreter lines
Update CHANGELOG, Modulefile for 2.3.3
fix regression in #11017 properly
Fix spec tests using the new spec_helper
Update CHANGELOG for 2.3.2 release
Make file_line default to ensure => present
Memoize file_line spec instance variables
Fix spec tests using the new spec_helper
Revert "Merge remote-tracking branch 'eshamow/tickets/bug/13595_restrict_initialize_everything_for_tests' into 2.2.x"
(#13595) initialize_everything_for_tests couples modules Puppet ver
|
|
The test_helper code in Puppet now resets function state between each test.
This patch fixes two spec files where the function was not actually loaded in
the tests, causing them to fail.
|
|
* 2.2.x:
Use rvalue functions correctly
|
|
A bug fix in Puppet exposed that several tests were using rvalue functions
incorrectly (this was not properly checked by puppet before). This fixes those
tests.
|
|
Without this patch applied the stdlib module has load-order issues with mocha
and rspec-puppet. The root cause has yet to be determined, but we've narrowed
it down to this description:
"If any rspec-puppet example groups run before parser function example groups
and the parser function example groups use mock() then you'll get this error:"
You can exercise this explicitly with:
rspec -fd spec/unit/puppet/{provider,type,parser}
This will ensure rspec runs all of the provider and type spec tests, which are
rspec-puppet ones, before the parser function specs are run. I should also
note we empted out the test in the file_line provider to be nothing except an
empty describe block and this was still sufficient to trigger the load order
error described here.
Failures:
1) function_get_module_path when locating a module should be able to find module paths from the modulepath setting
Failure/Error: mod = mock("Puppet::Module")
NoMethodError:
undefined method `mock' for #<RSpec::Core::ExampleGroup::Nested_14::Nested_1:0x107b946c0>
# ./spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/get_module_path_spec.rb:21
# ./spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/get_module_path_spec.rb:29
2) function_get_module_path when locating a module should be able to find module paths when the modulepath is a list
Failure/Error: mod = mock("Puppet::Module")
NoMethodError:
undefined method `mock' for #<RSpec::Core::ExampleGroup::Nested_14::Nested_1:0x107b81ea8>
# ./spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/get_module_path_spec.rb:21
# ./spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/get_module_path_spec.rb:34
3) function_get_module_path when locating a module should respect the environment
Failure/Error: mod = mock("Puppet::Module")
NoMethodError:
undefined method `mock' for #<RSpec::Core::ExampleGroup::Nested_14::Nested_1:0x107b6e808>
# ./spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/get_module_path_spec.rb:21
# ./spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/get_module_path_spec.rb:40
Finished in 1.53 seconds
326 examples, 3 failures, 1 pending
Paired-with: Andrew Parker <andy@puppetlabs.com>
|
|
This patch switches the spec tests for the get_module_path function to
use mock objects. The underlying Puppet::Module.find method has
reasonable test coverage inside of Puppet core so we might as well break
the tight dependency while we're fixing up the specs to use the new
parser scope.
The behavior of the parser function itself should still have complete
coverage even though the tests have switched to mock the implementation
inside of Puppet.
|
|
This patch is the same approach as the one that want into 2.2.x. It
covers the functions in 2.3.x that do not exist in 2.2.x.
Without this patch all of the spec tests for parser functions in stdlib
would instantiate their own scope instances. This is a problem because
the standard library is tightly coupled with the internal behavior of
Puppet. Tight coupling like this creates failures when we change the
internal behavior of Puppet. This is exactly what happened recently
when we changed the method signature for the initializer of
Puppet::Parser::Scope instances.
This patch fixes the problem by creating scope instances using the
puppet labs spec helper. The specific method that provides scope
instances in Puppet-version-independent way is something like this:
let(:scope) { PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetInternals.scope }
This patch simply implements this across the board.
|
|
* 2.2.x:
(Maint) Rename PuppetlabsSpec::Puppet{Seams,Internals}
(Maint) use PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetSeams.parser_scope
(Maint) Fix interpreter lines
|
|
The module PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetSeams has been renamed in the
puppetlabs_spec_helper gem to PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetInternals.
The method to obtain a scope object has also changed slightly. Without
this patch the spec tests will fail because the stdlib module is not
aligned with the spec helper gem. This patch fixes the problem by
matching up messages with their receivers in the spec helper library.
Paired-with: Andrew Parker <andy@puppetlabs.com>
|
|
Without this patch all of the spec tests for parser functions in stdlib
would instantiate their own scope instances. This is a problem because
the standard library is tightly coupled with the internal behavior of
Puppet. Tight coupling like this creates failures when we change the
internal behavior of Puppet. This is exactly what happened recently
when we changed the method signature for the initializer of
Puppet::Parser::Scope instances.
This patch fixes the problem by creating scope instances using the
puppet labs spec helper. The specific method that provides scope
instances in Puppet-version-independent way is something like this:
let(:scope) { PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetSeams.parser_scope }
This patch simply implements this across the board.
|
|
This time around I actually know why I'm doing this thanks to the
reminder from Nick Lewis.
Ruby will replace itself in memory with the executable listed in the
interpreter line if the string "ruby" is not in there.
Since /usr/bin/env rspec doesn't contain the substring "ruby", you can't
actually run ruby -W1 or whatever on the file.
This patch fixes the problem by making sure "ruby" is present,
preventing ruby from replacing itself in memory.
|
|
(#13205) Rotate array/string randomley based on fqdn, fqdn_rotate()
|
|
* 2.2.x:
(#13494) Specify the behavior of zero padded strings
Update CHANGELOG, Modulefile for 2.1.3
Conflicts:
CHANGELOG
Modulefile
|
|
Without this patch the specified behavior of strings that are numeric
only and zero padded is unclear and untested in the spec tests. This is
a problem because it's not clear that range('00', '10') will actually
return [ "0", "1", ..., "10" ] instead of [ "00", "01", ..., "10" ]
This patch addresses the issue by providing explicit test coverage. If
the string conversion behavior of puppet changes, this test will begin
to fail.
|
|
|
|
Without this patch, the previous change set to the
validate_absolute_path() parser function contains Puppet 2.6
incompatible changes. stdlib 2.x is compatible with Puppet 2.6. These
changes are a problem because we cannot introduce backwards incompatible
changes in a minor release.
This patch fixes the problem by back porting the implementation of the
`Puppet::Util.absolute_path?` from 2.7.x to the function block itself.
The function block tests to see if `Puppet::Util.absolute_path?` will
respond and if not, falls back to the inline back ported implementation.
The spec tests have been updated to simulate the behavior of Puppet 2.6
even when running with Puppet 2.7.
|