| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
* 2.4.x:
(Maint) Fix mis-use of rvalue functions as statements
Add .rspec file to repo root
|
|
* 2.3.x:
(Maint) Fix mis-use of rvalue functions as statements
Add .rspec file to repo root
|
|
* 2.2.x:
(Maint) Fix mis-use of rvalue functions as statements
Add .rspec file to repo root
|
|
* 2.1.x:
(Maint) Fix mis-use of rvalue functions as statements
Add .rspec file to repo root
Conflicts:
spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/getvar_spec.rb
spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/has_key_spec.rb
spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/merge_spec.rb
|
|
* fix/2.1.x/spec_failures:
(Maint) Fix mis-use of rvalue functions as statements
Add .rspec file to repo root
|
|
Without this patch applied the spec tests are invalid because they call
rvalue functions as if they were statements. This is a problem because
Puppet 2.7.x currently throws an exception if a rvalue function is
invoked as if it were a statement function. This exception from Puppet
is causing tests to fail.
This patch fixes the problem by changing the tests to assign the return
value of the functions to a variable. This fixes the problem by
invoking the functions properly.
Paired-with: Andrew Parker <andy@puppetlabs.com>
|
|
Without this patch we don't get an opinionated rspec behavior. This
patch makes the behavior of `rake test` and `rspec spec/` opinionated
by including some default options.
|
|
* fix/3.0.x/14422_readme:
(#14422) Update README to include the bug tracker URL.
|
|
As reported, it is indeed difficult to navigate directly to the correct
part of Redmine for a particular sub-project. This commit puts the
issue tracker URL front and center.
|
|
|
|
* fix/master/where_did_facts_dot_d_go:
Revert "Merge branch 'hkenney-ticket/master/2157_remove_facts_dot_d'"
|
|
This reverts commit cc414a422de0d773a1012ca57f41f15b4d6caf06, reversing
changes made to 29f8f89c19b2189aa78ab430e94671669cb4716c.
Conflicts:
README.markdown
Without this patch, there is no facts_dot_d functionality and we don't
have it implemented in Facter 2.0. This is a problem because Puppet
Enterprise and many users rely on facts.d support. We're also backwards
compatible with Facter 1.6 in stdlib 3.0 so this is a bug fix.
|
|
* release/master/three_dot_oh_dot_oh:
Update CHANGELOG, Modulefile for 3.0.0
(Maint) Update README for 3.0.0
|
|
|
|
This commit updates the README for 3.0.0 by taking a function list
produced with `puppet doc -r function` _without_ stdlib in the
`$LOAD_PATH` and then filtering out the native functions by executing
`puppet doc -r function` _with_ stdlib/lib in the `$LOAD_PATH` and then
running `comm -13 core_functions.txt all_functions.txt`
|
|
* bodepd-ensure_resource_attempt_2:
Explicitly load functions used by ensure_resource
Revert "Revert "Merge pull request #86 from bodepd/ensure_resource""
|
|
The ensure_resource function actually calls two
other functions, create_resources and defined_with_param.
When calling Puppet functions from Ruby, you sometimes have
to load the functions manually if they have not been called
before.
This commit explicitly loads the functions that ensure_resource
depends on from within the function.
|
|
This reverts commit 1e0983362464e8f2832239b09cdbc9175a51e6ec.
|
|
This reverts commit 42ddd7fe54f37b84e34b4a005de2249e53f07469, reversing
changes made to 53243605b28fc31618d079155c86b37b4e88a6ca.
|
|
Add function ensure_resource and defined_with_params
|
|
* 2.4.x:
Update Modulefile, CHANGELOG for 2.4.0
|
|
|
|
* 2.4.x:
Add support for a 'match' parameter to file_line
|
|
* feature/2.4.x/backport_file_line_match_pr75:
Add support for a 'match' parameter to file_line
|
|
This commit adds a new parameter called "match"
to the file_line resource type, and support for
this new parameter to the corresponding ruby
provider.
This parameter is optional; file_line should work
just as before if you do not specify this parameter...
so this change should be backwards-compatible.
If you do specify the parameter, it is treated
as a regular expression that should be used when
looking through the file for a line. This allows
you to do things like find a line that begins with
a certain prefix (e.g., "foo=.*"), and *replace*
the existing line with the line you specify in your
"line" parameter. Without this capability, if you
already had a line "foo=bar" in your file and your
"line" parameter was set to "foo=baz", you'd end up
with *both* lines in the final file. In many cases
this is undesirable.
|
|
* 2.4.x:
(#15872) Add to_bytes function
|
|
* feature/2.4.x/to_bytes_function:
(#15872) Add to_bytes function
|
|
Converts a string like "2 MB" to the value in bytes. Useful for
comparisons on facts that return a human readable number instead of
machine readable.
|
|
This commit refactors to ensure 80 character lines.
|
|
This commit adds better inline documentation
explaining how replicate resource definitions can
occur if the resource exists and does not have
matching parameters.
|
|
This commit adds better handling of the case where
undef is passed as the parameter value.
This works by converting '' into []
|
|
This commit adds 2 new functions with unit tests.
defined_with_params works similarily to puppet's defined
function, except it allows you to also specify a hash of
params. defined_with_params will return true if a resource
also exists that matches the specified type/title (just like
with defined) as well as all of the specified params.
ensure_resource is a function that basically combines defined_with_params
with create_resources to conditionally create resources only if the
specified resource (title, type, params) does not already exist.
These functions are created to serve as an alternative to using
defined as follows:
if ! defined(Package['some_package']) {
package { 'some_package': ensure => present,
}
The issue with this usage is that there is no guarentee about
what parameters were set in the previous definition of the package
that made its way into the catalog.
ensure_resource could be used instead, as:
ensure_resource('package', 'some_package', { 'ensure' => 'present' })
This will creat the package resources only if another resource does
not exist with the specified parameters.
|
|
* 2.4.x:
(Maint) use PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetInternals.scope (master)
Disable tests that fail on 2.6.x due to #15912
|
|
This patch is the same approach as the one that want into 2.3.x. It
covers the functions in master that do not exist in 2.3.x.
Without this patch all of the spec tests for parser functions in stdlib
would instantiate their own scope instances. This is a problem because
the standard library is tightly coupled with the internal behavior of
Puppet. Tight coupling like this creates failures when we change the
internal behavior of Puppet. This is exactly what happened recently
when we changed the method signature for the initializer of
Puppet::Parser::Scope instances.
This patch fixes the problem by creating scope instances using the
puppet labs spec helper. The specific method that provides scope
instances in Puppet-version-independent way is something like this:
let(:scope) { PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetInternals.scope }
This patch simply implements this across the board.
Paired-with: Andrew Parker <andy@puppetlabs.com>
|
|
* 2.3.x:
Disable tests that fail on 2.6.x due to #15912
|
|
* 2.2.x:
Disable tests that fail on 2.6.x due to #15912
|
|
In Puppet 2.6.x there is a bug where a function may be incorrectly detected as
an rvalue when it is not, or not detected when it is. This means that in tests
the correct syntax for calling a function will be rejected. This disables
those tests on 2.6.x, as there is no straightforward way to write them to be
compatible with both 2.6.x and newer versions of Puppet.
|
|
* 2.4.x:
Make sure functions are loaded for each test
Use rvalue functions correctly
(#2157) Make facts_dot_d compatible with external facts
Conflicts:
lib/facter/facter_dot_d.rb
|
|
* 2.3.x:
Make sure functions are loaded for each test
Use rvalue functions correctly
(Maint) Don't mock with mocha
(Maint) Fix up the get_module_path parser function
(Maint) use PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetSeams.parser_scope (2.3.x)
(Maint) Rename PuppetlabsSpec::Puppet{Seams,Internals}
(Maint) use PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetSeams.parser_scope
(Maint) Fix interpreter lines
Update CHANGELOG, Modulefile for 2.3.3
fix regression in #11017 properly
Fix spec tests using the new spec_helper
Update CHANGELOG for 2.3.2 release
Make file_line default to ensure => present
Memoize file_line spec instance variables
Fix spec tests using the new spec_helper
Revert "Merge remote-tracking branch 'eshamow/tickets/bug/13595_restrict_initialize_everything_for_tests' into 2.2.x"
(#13595) initialize_everything_for_tests couples modules Puppet ver
|
|
The test_helper code in Puppet now resets function state between each test.
This patch fixes two spec files where the function was not actually loaded in
the tests, causing them to fail.
|
|
* 2.2.x:
Use rvalue functions correctly
|
|
A bug fix in Puppet exposed that several tests were using rvalue functions
incorrectly (this was not properly checked by puppet before). This fixes those
tests.
|
|
* fix/master/fix_scope_dependency:
(Maint) use PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetInternals.scope (master)
|
|
This patch is the same approach as the one that want into 2.3.x. It
covers the functions in master that do not exist in 2.3.x.
Without this patch all of the spec tests for parser functions in stdlib
would instantiate their own scope instances. This is a problem because
the standard library is tightly coupled with the internal behavior of
Puppet. Tight coupling like this creates failures when we change the
internal behavior of Puppet. This is exactly what happened recently
when we changed the method signature for the initializer of
Puppet::Parser::Scope instances.
This patch fixes the problem by creating scope instances using the
puppet labs spec helper. The specific method that provides scope
instances in Puppet-version-independent way is something like this:
let(:scope) { PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetInternals.scope }
This patch simply implements this across the board.
Paired-with: Andrew Parker <andy@puppetlabs.com>
|
|
* 2.3.x:
(Maint) Don't mock with mocha
(Maint) Fix up the get_module_path parser function
(Maint) use PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetSeams.parser_scope (2.3.x)
(Maint) Rename PuppetlabsSpec::Puppet{Seams,Internals}
(Maint) use PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetSeams.parser_scope
(Maint) Fix interpreter lines
Conflicts:
spec/spec_helper.rb
spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/get_module_path_spec.rb
|
|
* maint/2.3.x/fix_rspec_puppet_load_order_issue:
(Maint) Don't mock with mocha
|
|
Without this patch applied the stdlib module has load-order issues with mocha
and rspec-puppet. The root cause has yet to be determined, but we've narrowed
it down to this description:
"If any rspec-puppet example groups run before parser function example groups
and the parser function example groups use mock() then you'll get this error:"
You can exercise this explicitly with:
rspec -fd spec/unit/puppet/{provider,type,parser}
This will ensure rspec runs all of the provider and type spec tests, which are
rspec-puppet ones, before the parser function specs are run. I should also
note we empted out the test in the file_line provider to be nothing except an
empty describe block and this was still sufficient to trigger the load order
error described here.
Failures:
1) function_get_module_path when locating a module should be able to find module paths from the modulepath setting
Failure/Error: mod = mock("Puppet::Module")
NoMethodError:
undefined method `mock' for #<RSpec::Core::ExampleGroup::Nested_14::Nested_1:0x107b946c0>
# ./spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/get_module_path_spec.rb:21
# ./spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/get_module_path_spec.rb:29
2) function_get_module_path when locating a module should be able to find module paths when the modulepath is a list
Failure/Error: mod = mock("Puppet::Module")
NoMethodError:
undefined method `mock' for #<RSpec::Core::ExampleGroup::Nested_14::Nested_1:0x107b81ea8>
# ./spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/get_module_path_spec.rb:21
# ./spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/get_module_path_spec.rb:34
3) function_get_module_path when locating a module should respect the environment
Failure/Error: mod = mock("Puppet::Module")
NoMethodError:
undefined method `mock' for #<RSpec::Core::ExampleGroup::Nested_14::Nested_1:0x107b6e808>
# ./spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/get_module_path_spec.rb:21
# ./spec/unit/puppet/parser/functions/get_module_path_spec.rb:40
Finished in 1.53 seconds
326 examples, 3 failures, 1 pending
Paired-with: Andrew Parker <andy@puppetlabs.com>
|
|
Fix up 2.3.x for new scope
|
|
This patch switches the spec tests for the get_module_path function to
use mock objects. The underlying Puppet::Module.find method has
reasonable test coverage inside of Puppet core so we might as well break
the tight dependency while we're fixing up the specs to use the new
parser scope.
The behavior of the parser function itself should still have complete
coverage even though the tests have switched to mock the implementation
inside of Puppet.
|
|
This patch is the same approach as the one that want into 2.2.x. It
covers the functions in 2.3.x that do not exist in 2.2.x.
Without this patch all of the spec tests for parser functions in stdlib
would instantiate their own scope instances. This is a problem because
the standard library is tightly coupled with the internal behavior of
Puppet. Tight coupling like this creates failures when we change the
internal behavior of Puppet. This is exactly what happened recently
when we changed the method signature for the initializer of
Puppet::Parser::Scope instances.
This patch fixes the problem by creating scope instances using the
puppet labs spec helper. The specific method that provides scope
instances in Puppet-version-independent way is something like this:
let(:scope) { PuppetlabsSpec::PuppetInternals.scope }
This patch simply implements this across the board.
|
