From ee776c448b1a87abc665863c092b99bd22a29bd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Silvio Rhatto Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 14:51:24 -0200 Subject: Books: One-dimensional man: chapter three --- books/sociedade/one-dimensional-man.md | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 296 insertions(+) (limited to 'books/sociedade') diff --git a/books/sociedade/one-dimensional-man.md b/books/sociedade/one-dimensional-man.md index 4fe0ad6..b239661 100644 --- a/books/sociedade/one-dimensional-man.md +++ b/books/sociedade/one-dimensional-man.md @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ [[!meta title="One-Dimensional Man"]] * Author: Hebert Marcuse +* Terms: institutionalized, adjusted sublimation ## Snippets @@ -533,3 +534,298 @@ A vicious circle seems indeed the proper image of a society which is self-expanding and self-perpetuating in its own preestablished direction—driven by the growing needs which it generates and, at the same time, contains. + +### Culture + + The greatness of a free literature and art, the ideals of humanism, the sorrows + and joys of the individual, the fulfillment of the personality are important + items in the competitive struggle between East and West. They speak heavily + against the present forms of communism, and they are daily administered and + sold. The fact that they contradict the society which sells them does not + count. Just as people know or feel that advertisements and political platforms + must not be necessarily true or right, and yet hear and read them and even let + themselves be guided by them, so they accept the traditional values and make + them part of their mental equipment. If mass communications blend together + harmoniously, and often unnoticeably, art, politics, religion, and philosophy + with commercials, they bring these realms of culture to their common + denominator—the commodity form. The music of the soul is also the music of + salesmanship. Exchange value, not truth value counts. On it centers the + rationality of the status quo, and all alien rationality is bent to it. + + As the great words of freedom and fulfillment are pronounced by campaigning + leaders and politicians, on the screens and radios and stages, they turn into + meaningless sounds which obtain meaning only in the context of propaganda, + business, discipline, and relaxation. This assimilation of the ideal with + reality testifies to the extent to which the ideal has been surpassed. It is + brought down from the sublimated realm of the soul or the spirit or the inner + man, and translated into operational terms and problems. Here are the + progressive elements of mass culture. The perversion is indicative of the fact + that advanced industrial society is confronted with the possibility of a + materialization of ideals. The capabilities of this society are progressively + reducing the sublimated realm in which the condition of man was represented, + idealized, and indicted. Higher culture becomes part of the material culture. + In this transformation, it loses the greater part of its truth. + + [...] + + Domination has its own aesthetics, and democratic domination has its democratic + aesthetics. It is good that almost everyone can now have the fine arts at his + fingertips, by just turning a knob on his set, or by just stepping into his + drugstore. In this diffusion, however, they become cogs in a culture-machine + which remakes their content. + + [...] + + Obviously, the physical transformation of the world entails the mental + transformation of its symbols, images, and ideas. Obviously, when cities and + highways and National Parks replace the villages, valleys, and forests; when + motorboats race over the lakes and planes cut through the skies—then these + areas lose their character as a qualitatively different reality, as areas of + contradiction. + + And since contradiction is the work of the Logos—rational confrontation of + “that which is not” with “that which is”—it must have a medium of + communication. The struggle for this medium, or rather the struggle against its + absorption into the predominant one-dimensionality, shows forth in the + avant-garde efforts to create an estrangement which would make the artistic + truth again communicable. + + Bertolt Brecht has sketched the theoretical foundations for these efforts. The + total character of the established society confronts the playwright with the + question of whether it is still possible to “represent the contemporary world + in the theater”—that is, represent it in such a manner that the spectator + recognizes the truth which the play is to convey. Brecht answers that the + contemporary world can be thus represented only if it is represented as subject + to change3—as the state of negativity which is to be negated. This is doctrine + which has to be learned, comprehended, and acted upon; but the theater is and + ought to be entertainment, pleasure. However, entertainment and learning are + not opposites; entertainment may be the most effective mode of learning. To + teach what the contemporary world really is behind the ideological and material + veil, and how it can be changed, the theater must break the spectator’s + identification with the events on the stage. + Not empathy and feeling, but distance and reflection are required. The + “estrangement-effect” (Verfremdungseffekt) is to produce this dissociation in + which the world can be recognized as what it is. “The things of everyday life + are lifted out of the realm of the self-evident.…”4 “That which is ‘natural’ + must assume the features of the extraordinary. Only in this manner can the laws + of cause and effect reveal themselves.”5 + + [...] + + The efforts to recapture the Great Refusal in the language of literature suffer + the fate of being absorbed by what they refute. As modern classics, the + avant-garde and the beatniks share in the function of entertaining without + endangering the good conscience of the men of good will. This absorption is + justified by technical progress; the refusal is refuted by the alleviation of + misery in the advanced industrial society. The liquidation of high culture is a + byproduct of the conquest of nature, and of the progressing conquest of + scarcity. + + Invalidating the cherished images of transcendence by incorporating them into + its omnipresent daily reality, this society testifies to the extent to which + insoluble conflicts are becoming manageable—to which tragedy and romance, + archetypal dreams and anxieties are being made susceptible to technical + solution and dissolution. The psychiatrist takes care of the Don Juans, Romeos, + Hamlets, Fausts, as he takes care of Oedipus—he cures them. The rulers of the + world are losing their metaphysical features. Their appearance on television, + at press conferences, in parliament, and at public hearings is hardly suitable + for drama beyond that of the advertisement,14 while the consequences of their + actions surpass the scope of the drama. + +### Adjusted desublimation + + In contrast to the pleasures of adjusted desublimation, sublimation preserves + the consciousness of the renunciations which the repressive society inflicts + upon the individual, and thereby preserves the need for liberation. To be sure, + all sublimation is enforced by the power of society, but the unhappy + consciousness of this power already breaks through alienation. To be sure, all + sublimation accepts the social barrier to instinctual gratification, but it + also transgresses this barrier. + + The Superego, in censoring the unconscious and in implanting conscience, also + censors the censor because the developed conscience registers the forbidden + evil act not only in the individual but also in his society. Conversely, loss + of conscience due to the satisfactory liberties granted by an unfree society + makes for a happy consciousness which facilitates acceptance of the misdeeds of + this society. It is the token of declining autonomy and comprehension. + Sublimation demands a high degree of autonomy and comprehension; it is + mediation between the conscious and the unconscious, between the primary and + secondary processes, between the intellect and instinct, renunciation and + rebellion. In its most accomplished modes, such as in the artistic oeuvre, + sublimation becomes the cognitive power which defeats suppression while bowing + to it. + + In the light of the cognitive function of this mode of sublimation, the + desublimation rampant in advanced industrial society reveals its truly + conformist function. This liberation of sexuality (and of aggressiveness) frees + the instinctual drives from much of the unhappiness and discontent that + elucidate the repressive power of the established universe of satisfaction. To + be sure, there is pervasive unhappiness, and the happy consciousness is shaky + enough—a thin surface over fear, frustration, and disgust. This unhappiness + lends itself easily to political mobilization; without room for conscious + development, it may become the instinctual reservoir for a new fascist way of + life and death. But there are many ways in which the unhappiness beneath the + happy consciousness may be turned into a source of strength and cohesion for + the social order. The conflicts of the unhappy individual now seem far more + amenable to cure than those which made for Freud’s “discontent in + civilization,” and they seem more adequately defined in terms of the “neurotic + personality of our time” than in terms of the eternal struggle between Eros and + Thanatos. + + [...] + + In accordance with the terminology used in the later works of Freud: sexuality + as “specialized” partial drive; Eros as that of the entire organism. + +### Crust + + In this general necessity, guilt has no place. One man can give the signal that + liquidates hundreds and thousands of people, then declare himself free from all + pangs of conscience, and live happily ever after. The antifascist powers who + beat fascism on the battlefields reap the benefits of the Nazi scientists, + generals, and engineers; they have the historical advantage of the late-comer. + What begins as the horror of the concentration camps turns into the practice of + training people for abnormal conditions—a subterranean human existence and the + daily intake of radioactive nourishment. A Christian minister declares that it + does not contradict Christian principles to prevent with all available means + your neighbor from entering your bomb shelter. Another Christian minister + contradicts his colleague and says it does. Who is right? Again, the neutrality + of technological rationality shows forth over and above politics, and again it + shows forth as spurious, for in both cases, it serves the politics of + domination. + + [...] + + It seems that even the most hideous transgressions can be repressed in such a + manner that, for all practical purposes, they have ceased to be a danger for + society. Or, if their eruption leads to functional disturbances in the + individual (as in the case of one Hiroshima pilot), it does not disturb the + functioning of society. A mental hospital manages the disturbance. + +### Game + + The Happy Consciousness has no limits—it arranges games with death and + disfiguration in which fun, team work, and strategic importance mix in + rewarding social harmony. The Rand Corporation, which unites scholarship, + research, the military, the climate, and the good life, reports such games in a + style of absolving cuteness, in its “RANDom News,” volume 9, number 1, under + the heading BETTER SAFE THAN SORRY. The rockets are rattling, the H-bomb is + waiting, and the space-flights are flying, and the problem is “how to guard the + nation and the free world.” In all this, the military planners are worried, for + “the cost of taking chances, of experimenting and making a mistake, may be + fearfully high.” But here RAND comes in; RAND relieves, and “devices like + RAND’S SAFE come into the picture.” The picture into which they come is + unclassified. It is a picture in which “the world becomes a map, missiles + merely symbols [long live the soothing power of symbolism!], and wars just + [just] plans and calculations written down on paper …” In this picture, RAND + has transfigured the world into an interesting technological game, and one can + relax—the “military planners can gain valuable ‘synthetic’ experience without + risk.” + + PLAYING THE GAME + + To understand the game one should participate, for understanding is “in the + experience.” + + Because SAFE players have come from almost every department at RAND as well as + the Air Force, we might find a physicist, an engineer, and an economist on the + Blue team. The Red team will represent a similar cross-section. + + The first day is taken up by a joint briefing on what the game is all about and + a study of the rules. When the teams are finally seated around the maps in + their respective rooms the game begins. Each team receives its policy statement + from the Game Director. These statements, usually prepared by a member of the + Control Group, give an estimate of the world situation at the time of playing, + some information on the policy of the opposing team, the objectives to be met + by the team, and the team’s budget. (The policies are changed for each game to + explore a wide range of strategic possibilities.) + +### Guilt + + Obviously, in the realm of the Happy Consciousness, guilt feeling has no place, + and the calculus takes care of conscience. When the whole is at stake, there is + no crime except that of rejecting the whole, or not defending it. Crime, guilt, + and guilt feeling become a private affair. Freud revealed in the psyche of the + individual the crimes of mankind, in the individual case history the history of + the whole. This fatal link is successfully suppressed. Those who identify + themselves with the whole, who are installed as the leaders and defenders of + the whole can make mistakes, but they cannot do wrong—they are not guilty. They + may become guilty again when this identification no longer holds, when they are + gone. + +### The Happy Conciousness + + The Happy Consciousness—the belief that the real is rational and that the + system delivers the goods—reflects the new conformism which is a facet of + technological rationality translated into social behavior. + +### Language, memory and history + + The unified, functional language is an irreconcilably anti-critical and + anti-dialectical language. In it, operational and behavioral rationality + absorbs the transcendent, negative, oppositional elements of Reason. + + I shall discuss17 these elements in terms of the tension between the “is” and + the “ought,” between essence and appearance, potentiality and + actuality—ingression of the negative in the positive determinations of logic. + This sustained tension permeates the two-dimensional universe of discourse + which is the universe of critical, abstract thought. The two dimensions are + antagonistic to each other; the reality partakes of both of them, and the + dialectical concepts develop the real contradictions. In its own development, + dialectical thought came to comprehend the historical character of the + contradictions and the process of their mediation as historical process. Thus + the “other” dimension of thought appeared to be historical dimension—the + potentiality as historical possibility, its realization as historical event. + + The suppresssion of this dimension in the societal universe of operational + rationality is a suppression of history, and this is not an academic but a + political affair. It is suppression of the society’s own past—and of its + future, inasmuch as this future invokes the qualitative change, the negation of + the present. A universe of discourse in which the categories of freedom + have become interchangeable and even identical with their opposites is not only + practicing Orwellian or Aesopian language but is repulsing and forgetting the + historical reality—the horror of fascism; the idea of socialism; the + preconditions of democracy; the content of freedom. If a bureaucratic + dictatorship rules and defines communist society, if fascist regimes are + functioning as partners of the Free World, if the welfare program of + enlightened capitalism is successfully defeated by labeling it “socialism,” if + the foundations of democracy are harmoniously abrogated in democracy, then the + old historical concepts are invalidated by up-to-date operational + redefinitions. The redefinitions are falsifications which, imposed by the + powers that be and the powers of fact, serve to transform falsehood into truth. + + The functional language is a radically anti-historical language: operational + rationality has little room and little use for historical reason.18 Is this + fight against history part of the fight against a dimension of the mind in + which centrifugal faculties and forces might develop—faculties and forces that + might hinder the total coordination of the individual with the society? + Remembrance of the past may give rise to dangerous insights, and the + established society seems to be apprehensive of the subversive contents of + memory. Remembrance is a mode of dissociation from the given facts, a mode of + “mediation” which breaks, for short moments, the omnipresent power of the given + facts. Memory recalls the terror and the hope that passed. Both come to life + again, but whereas in reality, the former recurs in ever new forms, the latter + remains hope. And in the personal events which reappear in the individual + memory, the fears and aspirations of mankind assert themselves—the universal in + the particular. It is history which memory preserves. It succumbs to the + totalitarian power of the behavioral universe + + [...] + + The closed language does not demonstrate and explain—it communicates decision, + dictum, command. Where it defines, the definition becomes “separation of good + from evil”; it establishes unquestionable rights and wrongs, and one value as + justification of another value. It moves in tautologies, but the tautologies + are terribly effective “sentences.” They pass judgment in a “prejudged form”; + they pronounce condemnation. For example, the “objective content,” that is, the + definition of such terms as “deviationist,” “revisionist,” is that of the penal + code, and this sort of validation promotes a consciousness for which the + language of the powers that be is the language of truth.24 + + [...] + + As the substance of the various regimes no longer appears in alternative modes + of life, it comes to rest in alternative techniques of manipulation and + control. Language not only reflects these controls but becomes itself an + instrument of control even where it does not transmit orders but information; + where it demands, not obedience but choice, not submission but freedom. -- cgit v1.2.3