Some papers on ontology

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/politics.bib b/politics.bib
index 5795189..9519047 100755
--- a/politics.bib
+++ b/politics.bib
@@ -471,3 +471,17 @@
   edition   = {},
   volume    = {},
 }
+
+@article{rosenthal2019,
+  author   = {Irena Rosenthal},
+  title    = {Ontology and political theory: A critical encounter between Rawls and Foucault},
+  journal  = {European Journal of Political Theory},
+  volume   = {18},
+  number   = {2},
+  pages    = {238-258},
+  year     = {2019},
+  doi      = {10.1177/1474885116659633},
+  url      = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116659633},
+  eprint   = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116659633},
+  abstract = {Contemporary political thought is deeply divided about the role of ontology in political thinking. Famously, political liberal John Rawls has argued that ontological claims are best to be avoided in political thought. In recent years, however, a number of theorists have claimed that ontology is essential to political philosophy. According to the contributors to this ‘ontological turn’, ontological investigations may foster the politicisation of hegemonic political theories and can highlight new possibilities for political life. This essay aims to contribute to the debate about ontology in political philosophy by arguing that a compelling case for ontology can also be made in light of Rawls’ political liberalism itself, in particular, by taking seriously Rawls’ commitment to the politicisation of justice and the task of orientation of political philosophy. To make this case, the paper brings Rawls' perspective in conversation with the critical methodology and the ontology of agonism and reflections on parrhesia or frank truth-telling of Michel Foucault.}
+}